Sometimes we need to think a bit more before we post. My last post was one of those times. I should have read the post and thought a bit more before I published it.
This is, in part, what I wrote: "Jane Still wrote that. I sort of think maybe she is the little girl she writes about". I should have put a bit more. Sort of along the lines of "And I apologise if I am wrong." Apparently, I was wrong. Sorry Jane. No harm or insult intended.
I do hope I was able to get my point across.
Unless any one should get the wrong impression. Let me state loudly and clearly, I do not, in any way at all, support the idea of child pornography or exploitation of children or teens at all, full stop, end of story! Do I make myself loud and clear? I hope so.
I got responses to the 2 emails I mentioned in my last post on this matter. It appears I am the only one who sees it the way I do. That is sad.
Having said that, I don't back down from what I said at all. I should perhaps, with the benefit of hind sight, been a bit more careful in my comments regarding Jane Still. For that I do apologise. But not for the gist of my comments.
In fact, I am going to sort of state it again. We ought not to call something dirty that God has called good. And God said what He created was "very good".
No comments:
Post a Comment